Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Jones v. Wellpath, LLC et al
as 0:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Bradley Jones
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, Shawn McKenzie, Judy Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Employers Mutual Casualty Company v. Clifford et al
as 5:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
Employers Mutual Casualty Company
Defendant:
Cheyeene R Clifford, Jessica Harper, Clifford's Construction, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Barnhill v. Paull
as 5:2023cv00062
Petitioner:
Yolanda Harper Barnhill
Respondent:
David Paull
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Harper-Barnhill v. Paul
as 5:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Harper-Barnhill
Defendant:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00041
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Harper v. GMS, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv00312
Defendant:
GMS, Inc. and Carter Hardware Company doing business as Valley Interior Products, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dennis Harper
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Sunz Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
4th Leaf, LLC v. City of Grayson et al
as 0:2019cv00018
Defendant:
Jack Harper, Pam Nash, Terry Stamper and others
Plaintiff:
4th Leaf, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. SSA
as 6:2017cv00212
Plaintiff:
Rayquan Dwight Harper
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Phillips v. Ballard et al
as 5:2017cv00301
Plaintiff:
Johnny R. Phillips
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe(s), Rodney Ballard, Brad Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
