Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00854
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Harper v. Radtke et al
as 2:2023cv01408
Plaintiff:
Kevin O Harper
Defendant:
Dylon Radtke, Michelle Haese, John Kind and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper, Marlin v. Fristam Pumps USA, LP et al
as 3:2023cv00583
Plaintiff:
Marlin Harper
Defendant:
Fristam Pumps USA, LP and The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Harper v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2022cv01542
Petitioner:
Kevin O Harper
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ghashiyah (Khan) v. Carr et al
as 2:2022cv00924
Plaintiff:
Tayr Kilaab al Ghashiyah (Khan)
Defendant:
Kevin Carr, Brian Foster, Anthony Meli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Harper v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv00869
Plaintiff:
Sharon Harper
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Mark, Jonathon v. Harper
as 3:2022cv00364
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Mark
Defendant:
Ms. Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harper v. USA
as 3:2022cv00316
Petitioner:
Kelly Harper
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Harper, Kevin v. Boughton, Gary et al
as 3:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Kevin Omar Harper
Defendant:
Gary Boughton, Mr. Jaeger, Mark Kartman and others
Not Classified By Court:
GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. USA
as 3:2021cv00707
Petitioner:
Joseph Harper
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
