Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Wood v. Pozeg et al
as 7:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Jameson James Wood
Defendant:
Michael Pozeg, Larry Meadows, J. Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ingram v. Hamilton et al
as 7:2023cv00801
Plaintiff:
Marcus C. Ingram
Defendant:
Israel Hamilton, J. Harrison and C. Squires
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saunders v. Dotson
as 7:2023cv00729
Plaintiff:
Darrell Jermaine Saunders
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Mrs. Bethany and A.S. Harrison
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Harrison
as 7:2023cv00498
Plaintiff:
Keyanta Lamont Moore
Defendant:
Lt. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moss v. Younkin et al
as 7:2023cv00457
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Moss
Defendant:
Glen Younkin, John S. Edwards, R. Creigh Deeds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nealson v. Owens et al
as 7:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
Christian Thomas Nealson
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Owens, J. Harrison, M. Posaik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Squire et al
as 7:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
Keyanta Lamont Moore
Defendant:
Sgt. C. Squire, Sgt. N. Bowman, R. Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitfield v. Artis et al
as 2:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
David M. Whitfield
Defendant:
Sgt Artis, Ches. Jail Medical Staff, Sgt Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nealson v. Reynolds et al
as 7:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
Christian Thomas Nealson
Defendant:
Reynolds, S.K. Coleman, Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Harrison et al
as 7:2023cv00218
Defendant:
H. Harr, J. Harrison, T. Lowe and others
Plaintiff:
Deon Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
