Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Harrison, Chardez v. Wall, Ed et al
as 3:2019cv00621
Defendant:
Officer T. Taves, Paul Westerhaus, Officer C. Peterlik and others
Plaintiff:
Chardez M. Harrison
Not Yet Classified:
GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison, Mark et al v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 3:2019cv00194
Plaintiff:
Ellen C. Harrison and Mark W. Harrison
Defendant:
US Department of Justice, Commission of Internal Revenue Service and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Harrison v. Moultrie County Illinois et al
as 2:2018cv00957
Defendant:
Richard L Broch, James A Knecht, Lisa Holder White and others
Plaintiff:
Lyle Roger Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin, Harrison et al v. Dittman, Michael et al
as 3:2018cv00381
Plaintiff:
Harrison Franklin
Defendant:
Michael Dittman , Kalen Ruck, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans, LaDell et al v. Gallinger, C.O. II et al
as 3:2018cv00194
Plaintiff:
LaDell A. Evans and Brandon A. Harrison
Defendant:
C.O. II Gallinger , C.O. II McDaniels , John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Foster et al
as 2:2017cv01080
Plaintiff:
Remo Harrison Daniels
Defendant:
Brian Foster , Sarah Cooper, Tony Meil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Deblanc et al
as 2:2017cv00681
Plaintiff:
Remo Harrison Daniels
Defendant:
Dr Deblanc, Captain Olson , Lt Kuepper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Foster et al
as 2:2017cv00680
Plaintiff:
Remo Harrison Daniels
Defendant:
Brian Foster , Sarah Cooper, Tony Meli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Waupun Correctional Institution
as 2:2016cv01632
Plaintiff:
Remo Harrison Daniels
Defendant:
Waupun Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
