Cases 41 - 50 of 405
JOHNSON v. DOLLINGER et al
as 2:2018cv04751
Plaintiff:
RETHA JOHNSON
Defendant:
DANIEL KUHN, MARY DOLLINGER, LAMONT PENDLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP v. COSBY
as 2:2018cv04504
Plaintiff:
SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP
Defendant:
WILLIAM HENRY COSBY, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRISON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv04384
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, LIEUTENANT MELVIN WILLIAMS, SERGEANT ANDREW BYARD and others
Plaintiff:
AARON HARRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv04244
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
HARPER v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2018cv04182
Plaintiff:
IRVIN SAMUEL HARPER
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DETECTIVE DANIEL O'MALLEY, NURSE TONI SEAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
G.S. v. ROSE TREE MEDIA SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2018cv04104
Defendant:
ELEANOR DIMARINO-LINNEN, ROSE TREE MEDIA SCHOOL DISTRICT, RALPH HARRISON and others
Plaintiff:
G.S.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORRIS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2018cv03616
Plaintiff:
HARRISON MCKINLEY MORRIS, JR.
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HARRISON v. PELHAM COURT LP et al
as 2:2018cv03431
Defendant:
PELHAM COURT LP and RUSHMORE MANAGEMENT
Plaintiff:
BRENDA HARRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
NUPSON v. SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS, LLP et al
as 2:2018cv02505
Plaintiff:
ANNA K. NUPSON
Defendant:
SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS, LLP and BRUCE A. ROSENFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUBIN v. SOLEBURY TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2018cv02103
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HARRISON RUBIN
Defendant:
SOLEBURY TOWNSHIP, MICHAEL RODGERS, SOLEBURY TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
