Cases 81 - 90 of 533
Harrison v. Tyler Technologies, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00607
Plaintiff:
Talia N. Harrison
Defendant:
Tyler Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Harrison v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2021cv00148
Petitioner:
Gregory Harrison
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harrison v. Pace et al. DO NOT DOCKET IN 4:21-cv-2457). CASE IS CONSOLIDATED UNDER 4:21-cv-2436).
as 4:2021cv02457
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Harrison
Defendant:
Jared T. S. Pace, Condon Tobin Sladek Thornton and FCI Lender Services
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Harrison v. Pace et al. DO NOT DOCKET IN 4:12-cv-2435. CASE IS CONSOLIDATED UNDER 4:21-cv-2436.
as 4:2021cv02435
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Harrison
Defendant:
Jared T.S. Pace and Condon Tobin Sladek Thornton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harrison v. Lumpkin
as 4:2021cv02362
Petitioner:
Gregory Harrison
Respondent:
Director TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harrison v. Dr. Wendy M. Elliott, PHD
as 4:2021cv02316
Plaintiff:
Delwin L. Harrison
Defendant:
Dr. Wendy M. Elliott, PHD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Business Advisors MD LLC v. Natural State Laboratories LLC et al
as 3:2021cv01451
Defendant:
Sharon Miller, Natural State Laboratories, LLC, Natural State Genomics, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Business Advisors MD, LLC and Business Advisors MD LLC
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Harrison v. Sommers et al
as 4:2021cv01979
Plaintiff:
Wendell Harrison
Defendant:
Oscar Sommers, Judith Shields and Blake Enax
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cates v. Harrison
as 3:2021cv01244
Defendant:
Tiffany A Harrison
Plaintiff:
Letha V Cates
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Starke, Jr. v. Shipman et al
as 4:2021cv00394
Defendant:
Adam Pauyer, Kaft, Moreno and others
Plaintiff:
Charles B Starke, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
