Cases 121 - 130 of 183
Sumrall v. Corso et al
as 1:2014cv00221
Plaintiff:
Dashawn L. Sumrall
Defendant:
Frederick Corso, Joseph Tuten, Melvin Brisolara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Housley et al v. Harrison County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2014cv00205
Plaintiff:
Christopher Housley and Alonzo Reaves
Defendant:
Harrison County, Mississippi, Harrison County Board of Supervisors, Melvin Brisolara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greer v. McCarty et al
as 1:2014cv00079
Plaintiff:
Bernard Greer
Defendant:
Patrick McCarty and Harrison County Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Presley v. Brissolara et al
as 1:2014cv00130
Plaintiff:
Larry Dean Presley
Defendant:
Melvin T. Brissolara, David Sanderson, Elaine Lege and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. Harrison County Board of Supervisors et al
as 1:2014cv00061
Plaintiff:
John Hale
Defendant:
Harrison County Board of Supervisors, Unknown Washington, Unknown Coulter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maldin v. Harrison County Detention Center Medical Associates, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00054
Plaintiff:
Damon Luther Mauldin
Defendant:
Harrison County Detention Center Medical Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Parole Board et al
as 1:2013cv00350
Plaintiff:
Larry Jones
Defendant:
Parole Board, Harrison County and Jackson County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Jones v. Harrison County et al
as 1:2013cv00237
Plaintiff:
Larry Jones
Defendant:
Harrison County and State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Doe et al
as 1:2013cv00225
Plaintiff:
Calvin Smith
Defendant:
John Doe and Harrison County Board of Supervisors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Harrison County et al
as 1:2013cv00088
Plaintiff:
Larry Jones
Defendant:
Harrison County and State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
