Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Thomas v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv22088
Plaintiff:
Harry Thomas
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. United States of America
as 5:2020cv00083
Petitioner:
Harry Thomas Williams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Harry Williams v. USA
as 18-11623
Petitioner - Appellant:
HARRY THOMAS WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Williams v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv00049
Petitioner:
Harry Thomas Williams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Thomas v. America's Servicing Company et al
as 2:2015cv00019
Plaintiff:
Harry Thomas
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank , American Servicing Company and Wells Fargo Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. Johnson et al
as 3:2013cv00063
Plaintiff:
Brittany Williams
Defendant:
Robert Johnson , Angie Pittman , James McLaughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonough v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv03052
Plaintiff:
Harry Thomas McDonough
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv00923
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Aurich v. Thomas et al
as 9:2008cv80108
Plaintiff:
Stuart Duane Aurich
Defendant:
Harry Thomas and Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Strickland et al v. Prison Health Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv02190
Plaintiff:
Brenda Strickland and Corey Williams
Defendant:
Prison Health Services, Inc., Syed Rizvi, Brian Woodard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
