Cases 11 - 20 of 27
eDekka LLC v. Harry and David, LLC
as 2:2014cv00444
Plaintiff:
eDekka LLC
Defendant:
Harry and David, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Data Carriers LLC v. Harry and David, et al.
as 1:2014cv00147
Plaintiff:
Data Carriers LLC
Defendant:
Harry and David and Harry & David Operations Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Select Retrieval, LLC v. Altrec, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01104
Defendant:
Altrec, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Bag Barrow or Steal, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Select Retrieval, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Harry and David v. Anshu Pathak
as 11-56504
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HARRY AND DAVID, an Oregon Corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
ANSHU B. PATHAK, an individual, DBA Brentwood Trading Group, DBA Organic Fruit of the Month Club, DBA Premium Enterprises
Harry and David v. Anshu Pathak
as 11-35716
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HARRY AND DAVID, an Oregon corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
ANSHU PATHAK
Anshu B Pathak v. ICG America Inc et al
as 5:2011cv00055
Defendant:
24 Seven Enterprises NV Inc, C & H Clubs USA Inc, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Anshu B Pathak
Harry and David v. J & P Acquisition Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00124
Plaintiff:
Harry and David
Defendant:
J & P Acquisition Inc., Donald Hachenberger and Glenda Hachenberger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Harry and David, an Oregon Corporation v. J&P Acquisition, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv03056
Plaintiff:
Harry and David, an Oregon Corporation and Harry and David, an Oregon Corporation
Defendant:
J&P Acquisition, Inc., Donald Hachenberger and Glenda Hachenberger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Harry and David, an Oregon Corporation v. Ruma's Fruit & Gift Basket World, Inc.
as 1:2009cv03044
Plaintiff:
Harry and David, an Oregon Corporation
Defendant:
Ruma's Fruit & Gift Basket World, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
