Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Foster v. Connecticut
as 3:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Hassan Foster
Defendant:
State of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
UI-Hassan v. United States Of America
as 3:2022cv01231
Petitioner:
Mahmoud Ui-Hassan and Mahmood UI-Hassan
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ali v. DSSC Digital Software Solutions (Cyprus), LTD et al
as 3:2019cv01655
Defendant:
Hassan Farah Mohamed, DSSC Digital Software Solutions (Cyprus), LTD, MTECH Applied Software Trading, L.L.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Ismail Ali
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ali v. DSSC Digital Software Solutions (Cyprus), LTD et al
as 3:2019cv01620
Defendant:
Hassan Farah Mohamed, Uruthra Kumar Sheedharan, MTECH Applied Software Trading, L.L.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Ismail Ali
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mohamed v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv02015
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Marian Hassan Mohamed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mystic Oil Co, Inc v. A1 Petroleum LLC et al
as 3:2018cv01364
Defendant:
Syed Hassan Afzaal and A1 Petroleum LLC
Plaintiff:
Mystic Oil Company, Incorporated and Mystic Oil Co, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Foster v. Kenny et al
as 3:2017cv01547
Plaintiff:
Hassan Foster
Defendant:
Kenny, Reyes and Harrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster v. Suffield
as 3:2017cv00310
Plaintiff:
Hassan Foster
Defendant:
City of Suffield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster v. Kenny et al
as 3:2016cv01806
Plaintiff:
Hassan Foster
Defendant:
Kenny, Reyes and Harrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sabir v. Hunter's Ambulance Services
as 3:2016cv01508
Plaintiff:
Hassan Sabir
Defendant:
Hunter's Ambulance Services
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
