Cases 1 - 10 of 13
US BANK TRUST COMPANY NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. HATCH
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
US BANK TRUST COMPANY NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
STACEY E HATCH
Interested Party:
FRAY-LYN CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
HARTLETT et al v. STATE OF MAINE et al
as 1:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
BARBARA JEAN HARTLETT and ABRAHAM LEE STAPLES
Defendant:
STATE OF MAINE, JOANNE COOKSON, TAMIA KINGBURRY and others
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GURHAN v. CITY OF SACO et al
as 2:2019cv00349
Plaintiff:
KHALID GURHAN
Defendant:
CITY OF SACO, DETECTIVE RYAN HATCH, CITY OF BIDDEFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAY v. STATE OF MAINE et al
as 2:2018cv00232
Plaintiff:
ROY A DAY
Defendant:
STATE OF MAINE, MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT, ELLEN A GORMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
DEAN v. CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 1:2011cv00427
Defendant:
CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES, JOSEPH SHUBERT and TAMI HATCH
Plaintiff:
DAVID F DEAN, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SALLEY v. LIBBY et al
as 1:2011cv00198
Plaintiff:
HORACE SALLEY
Defendant:
LIBBY, DWIGHT FOWELS, PATRICIA BARNHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAWEH v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 1:2011cv00172
Plaintiff:
KHADAR I ADAWEH
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, VICTORIA MATTHEWS, THERESA KESTELOOT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALLACE v. HANCOCK COUNTY et al
as 1:2010cv00511
Plaintiff:
NINA D WALLACE
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY, DIANA HENRY, APRIL HATCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
