Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 98
Keck Medical Center of USC et al v. Hawaii Medical Service Association
as 2:2024cv01892
Plaintiff: Keck Medical Center of USC and Keck Hospital of USC
Defendant: Hawaii Medical Service Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
de Moor et al v. Anthem Blue Cross et al
as 4:2023cv00968
Defendant: Blue Cross Blue Shield Healthcare Plan of Georgia, Inc., Hawaii Medical Services Corporation doing business as Hawaii Medical Services Association also known as Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Hawaii, Rocky Mountain Hospital and Medical Service, Inc. formerly known as Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Colorado doing business as Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Nevada and others
Plaintiff: MD Carrie de Moor and Code 3 Emergency Physicians, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
PROGRESSIVE SPINE & ORTHOPAEDICS v. HAWAII MEDICAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION
as 2:2022cv06918
Plaintiff: PROGRESSIVE SPINE & ORTHOPAEDICS
Defendant: HAWAII MEDICAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Stanford Health Care v. Hawaii Medical Service Association
as 1:2022cv00467
Plaintiff: Stanford Health Care
Defendant: Hawaii Medical Service Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. et al v. Anthem Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01256
Plaintiff: Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., Automobile Club of Southern California, Darling Ingredients Inc and others
Defendant: Anthem Inc d/b/a ANthem Blue Cross LIfe and Health Insurance Company agent of WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Frederick A. Nitta, M.D., Inc. v. Hawaii Medical Service Association
as 1:2022cv00371
Plaintiff: Frederick A. Nitta, M.D., Inc., Frederick A. Nitta, Hawaii County Medical Society and others
Defendant: Hawaii Medical Service Association, Doe Persons 1-10, Doe Partnerships 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00266
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Violation of Americans with Disabilities Act
JetBlue Airways Corporation et al v. Anthem Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00558
Plaintiff: JetBlue Airways Corporation, JetBlue Airways Group Health Insurance Plan, Kraft Heinz Company, The and others
Defendant: Anthem Inc formerly doing business as WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2022cv00265
Defendant: Anthem Inc formerly known as WELLPOINT INC doing business as Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company doing business as Blue Cross of California doing business as BLUE CROSS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA doing business as Blue Cross of Northern C, Independence Health Group Inc and Independence Hospital Indemnity Plan Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama and others
Plaintiff: Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 1:2021cv09101
Plaintiff: Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Defendant: Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, PREMERA and Premera Blue Cross, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?