Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Hawks v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 3:2015cv00124
Plaintiff:
Debbie Hawks
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Indy Transport, Inc. v. T. D. Hawks, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00343
Plaintiff:
Indy Transport, Inc.
Defendant:
T. D. Hawks, Inc. and Swett & Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Hawk et al
as 3:2014cv00038
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Carol D. Hawk, Donald Nelson Hawk, Sr. and Cashland Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Martinez v. Vondewigelo
as 5:2013cv00132
Plaintiff:
Leonel Martinez
Defendant:
Bruce Vondewigelo, Howard, Hawking and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawks et al v. Clute, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00388
Plaintiff:
Sidney S. Hawks and Carol J. Hawks
Defendant:
Clute, LLC and Robert W. Mullins
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Clute, LLC and Robert W. Mullins
Thirdparty_defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Burnett v. Transit Authority of Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government et al
as 5:2011cv00350
Plaintiff:
Timothy Burnett
Defendant:
Transit Authority of Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government , John Does , Amalogamated Transit Union and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Childress v. Hawk
as 4:2011cv00045
Plaintiff:
Myles Childress
Defendant:
Pamela M. Hawk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hawks v. Crews
as 3:2010cv00028
Petitioner:
Alfred Wayne Hawks
Respondent:
Cookie Crews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hawks v. Does et al
as 3:2010cv00169
Plaintiff:
Alfred Wayne Hawks
Defendant:
John Does, Jane Does, Kentucky State Reformatory Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
