Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv11313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Dye v. Hazel Park, City of et al
as 2:2023cv10065
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Dye
Defendant:
Hazel Park, City of, Officer Trevor Deanovich and Officer Officer Holifield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Stoecker v. HAYAT PROVISIONING CENTER HAZEL PARK, LLC
as 2:2022cv12331
Plaintiff:
Abbie Stoecker
Defendant:
HAYAT PROVISIONING CENTER HAZEL PARK, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
WESLEYAN MISSION INC v. City of Hazel Park et al
as 2:2022cv11365
Plaintiff:
WESLEYAN MISSION INC
Defendant:
City of Hazel Park and Edward Klobucher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
DJR Properties LLC v. Hazel Park, City of
as 2:2021cv12039
Plaintiff:
DJR Properties LLC
Defendant:
Hazel Park, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ivy Room LLC dba Timeless Galleria et al v. Hazel Park, City of et al
as 2:2021cv10910
Defendant:
Melissa Schwartz, Hazel Park, City of, Jeffrey Campbell and others
Plaintiff:
Ericka Reed and Ivy Room LLC dba Timeless Galleria
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv10627
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wadley et al v. Hazel Park School District et al
as 2:2018cv12063
Defendant:
Lynette Daley and Hazel Park School District
Plaintiff:
Serenity Wadley and Kenyette Wadley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pilot v. Johnson et al
as 5:2018cv11097
Plaintiff:
Michael Charles Pilot
Defendant:
Ruth Johnson, Charles G Goedert, Hazel Park, City of and others
Pilot v. The State of Michigan 43rd Judicial District Court et al
as 2:2016cv14382
Plaintiff:
Michael Charles Pilot
Defendant:
The State of Michigan 43rd Judicial District Court, James Patterson and Hazel Park, City of
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
