Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Craft v. Townsend et al
as 6:2023cv01081
Plaintiff:
Robert Craft
Defendant:
Jacob Townsend, John Linneman, Teresa Glendening and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Brown v. Kansas Department of Corrections
as 5:2023cv03072
Petitioner:
Rico J. Brown, Sr.
Respondent:
Kansas Department of Corrections and Hazel M. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDonald (ID 113183) v. Peterson et al
as 5:2022cv03197
Plaintiff:
Sean E. McDonald
Defendant:
Hazel M. Peterson, Sara Beth Collins, Brandon Gitchel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Savery (ID 100096) v. Peterson
as 5:2022cv03035
Petitioner:
Oneth B. Savery
Respondent:
Hazel M. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson (ID 85853) v. Petersen
as 5:2022cv03031
Petitioner:
Charvelle Lamont Robinson
Respondent:
Hazel Petersen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Courson v. Reno County, Kansas, Board of Commissioners et al.
as 5:2021cv03270
Plaintiff:
Realiti Courson
Defendant:
Reno County, Kansas, Board of Commissioners, Randy Henderson, Shawn McClay and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Lightfield Ammunition Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hazell v. United States of America
as 6:2021cv01206
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Hazell
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
McDonald (ID 113183) v. Peterson et al
as 5:2021cv03060
Defendant:
Sara Beth Collins, Hazel M. Peterson and Jedediah R. Ewing
Plaintiff:
Sean E. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hazel v. Cramer et al
as 5:2020cv03286
Defendant:
(fnu) Trevor, (fnu) Eagle, (fnu) Misler and others
Plaintiff:
James Russell Hazel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wieslander v. Barragan
as 5:2020cv04061
Plaintiff:
Megan Wieslander
Defendant:
Hazel Loruama Barragan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
