Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Hill v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 1:2023cv00406
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Genesis Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 2:2023cv01275
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 2:2022cv04421
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Norman Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Woods v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 2:2022cv04420
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Aramark Correctional Services and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whatley v. Shumaker et al
as 3:2022cv01456
Plaintiff:
J. Whatley
Defendant:
Nurse Patricia Shumaker, Officer Patineo, Officer Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Small v. Clermont County Jail / Employees et al
as 1:2018cv00897
Defendant:
Capt. McConnell, Corporal Smeeze, Clermont County Jail / Employees and others
Plaintiff:
Benny Ivan Small
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Marquis et al
as 1:2017cv01220
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Williams
Defendant:
Dave Marquis, Health Care Administrator, Carla Bernard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leech v. Management & Training Corp. et al
as 3:2017cv01158
Plaintiff:
Terrell Leech
Defendant:
Management & Training Corp. , MTC Medical, LLC , Tyler Stuckey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Combs v. Bunting et al
as 2:2015cv00702
Plaintiff:
Harold Combs
Defendant:
Jason Bunting, Polly Schmalz, Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Mohr et al
as 3:2014cv02105
Plaintiff:
Dante' D. Gordon
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Gary Croft, Margaret Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
