Cases 11 - 20 of 146
Encarnacion v. Annucci
as 22-2913
Petitioner:
Bernabe Encarnacion
Respondent:
J. Spinner, Anthony Annucci, Commissioner of DOCCS, Albert Prack, Director, Special Housing Unit/Inmate Disciplinary Program and others
Vidal v. State of New York
as 22-2729
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Vidal
Defendant / Appellee:
Anthony J. Annucci, Acting Commissioner, State of New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Anthony Rodriguez, Acting Director of Special Housing Unit/Inmate Disciplinary Program, Eric Corbett, Food Service Administrator/Disciplinary Hearing Officer, Great Meadow Correctional Facility and others
Defendant:
State of New York, Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Phil Melecio, Deputy Superintendent for Programs and others
Stevens v. Bell
as 22-1571
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sterling Stevens
Defendant / Appellee:
Sergeant Duquette, Facility Claim Review Investigator and M. Miller, Package Room Officer
Defendant:
Earl Bell, Superintendent; Clinton Correctional Facility, C. Delutis, Captain; Tier II Appeal Review Officer and Rocky Kramer, Lt.; Tier II Hearing Officer
Funches v. Russo
as 22-1473
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Trevis L. Funches, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Anthony Russo, Deputy Supt. for Security; Eastern NY Correctional Facility
Defendant:
Blum, Correctional Officer; Eastern NY Correctional Facility, C. Cruz, Correctional Officer; Eastern NY Correctional Facility, A. Polizzi, Commissioner Hearing Officer; Eastern NY Correctional Facility and others
Valverde v. Folks
as 22-848
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Angel Valverde
Defendant / Appellee:
J.D. Folks, Correction Officer at Sing Sing Correctional Facility, L. Brown, Correction Officer at Sing Sing Correctional Facility, John Gonzalez, Sergeant at Sing Sing Correctional Facility and others
Maione v. Zucker
as 22-782
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Scott Maione and Tasha Ostler
Defendant / Appellee:
Dr. Howard A. Zucker, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health, Samuel D. Roberts, Commissioner of the New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, Darlene Oto, Principal Hearing Officer, Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance and others
Defendant:
Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, Office of Administrative Hearings, Nirav Shah, Former Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health, Kirsten M. Proud, Former Commissioner of the New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance and others
Not Classified By Court:
Department of Justice
Pickering-George v. Commissioner of Social Securit
as 22-597
Petitioner:
John T. Pickering-George
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Secuirty Administration, ALJ, SSA, Office of Disability Adjudication and Review Hearing Office, United States Department of Justice, Civil Division and others
Sosa v. Sweet
as 22-526
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Andres R. Sosa
Defendant / Appellee:
Craig Burns, Psychiatric MD, PhD., Robert Berger, Psychiatric MD, PhD. and Christina Carole Wright, PSY-APRN
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Christopher Sweet, Correctional Officer David Evans, Correctional Officer L'T Brian Stadalnik and others
Mitchell v. Cuomo
as 21-2978
Plaintiff:
Ismael G. Reyes, AKA Ishmael Reyes and Gyvon Roberts
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dontie S. Mitchell and Dontie S Mitchell
Defendant / Appellee:
Anthony J. Annucci, Acting Commissioner, Patrick D. Reardon, Superintendent, Marcy Correctional Facility, C.O. John Doe #1 and others
Defendant:
Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor, SORC Colbert, C.O Brown and others
Morrow v. Bauersfeld
as 21-2928
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Neb Morrow, III
Defendant / Appellee:
Bauersfeld, Commissioner's Hearing Officer (CHO), Auburn Correctional Facility
Defendant:
Harold Graham, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional Facility, Sergeant Van Fleet, Superintendent of D-Block, Auburn Correctional Facility and J. Perkins, Corrections Officer in D-Block, Auburn Correctional Facility
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
