Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Ballard v. Kittrell et al
as 5:2022hc02110
Petitioner:
Robert S. Ballard
Respondent:
Sgt. V. Kittrell, Officer T. Smith, Officer Fina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Unknown Defendant
as 5:2021ct03304
Plaintiff:
Larry Brandon Moore
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant, State of North Carolina, NC Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henslee v. Stoppell et al
as 5:2019ct03369
Defendant:
Disciplinary Hearing Officer, Sgt. Mansphit, Sgt. Stoppell and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Henslee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinton v. Bennett et al
as 5:2019ct03299
Defendant:
S. Collier, Shirley Bennett, Disciplinary Hearing Officer and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leggitt v. Ruel et al
as 5:2018ct03313
Defendant:
Ms. Daniels, Tiffany Williams, Hearing Officer Leach and others
Plaintiff:
Terry W. Leggitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Murray v. Adams et al
as 5:2018ct03026
Plaintiff:
Ambrose Murray
Defendant:
Major Adams and Disciplinary Hearing Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
May v. Solomon et al
as 5:2017ct03014
Plaintiff:
James Anthony May
Defendant:
George T. Solomon, Monica Bond, Kevin Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortez v. Medical Administrator at Central Prison et al
as 5:2015ct03251
Plaintiff:
Antonio Medramo Ortez
Defendant:
Medical Administrator at Central Prison, Medical Administrator at Harnett Prison, Medical Administrator at Caledonia Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEBANE v. HOFFMAN et al
as 1:2014cv00309
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE MEBANE
Defendant:
PATRICIA HOFFMAN, D.H.O. DESIGNATED HEARING OFFICER, DR. SAMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mebane v. Hoffman et al
as 5:2014ct03090
Plaintiff:
James Mebane
Defendant:
Patricia Hoffman, D.H.O. Designated Hearing Officer, Dr. Sampson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
