Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Hunsucker v. Karren et al
as 5:2023cv05189
Plaintiff:
Heath Lee Hunsucker
Defendant:
Judge Brad Karren and Deputy Prosecutor Kelsey Six
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bryant v. Loggains
as 3:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
Arthur Bryant
Defendant:
Heath Loggains
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Heath v. Benton County, Arkansas et al
as 5:2020cv05220
Defendant:
Benton County Sheriff's Office, Shawn Holloway and Benton County, Arkansas
Plaintiff:
Robin Heath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Davenport et al v. Little Rock, City of et al
as 4:2019cv00552
Defendant:
Matthew Thomas, Jeff Holt, Stuart Young and others
Plaintiff:
Lloyd St Clair, Floyd St Clair, Susan Davenport and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Heath Dickson
as 6:2019cv06043
Defendant:
Hot Springs County, AR, 153-CPL Heath Dickson and Malvern Police Department
Plaintiff:
Eric D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norwood v. Dickson et al
as 6:2018cv06124
Defendant:
John Doe, 1-50, The Malvern City Police Department, The Hot Spring County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Daniel Norwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Finley v. Loggains et al
as 3:2018cv00055
Plaintiff:
Chris Finley
Defendant:
Heath Loggains, Jonesboro, City of, Jonesboro Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mullen v. Jonesboro Arkansas, City of et al
as 3:2016cv00136
Plaintiff:
Mullen and Thurstle Mullen
Defendant:
Jonesboro Arkansas, City of, Heath Loggains, Daniel Gifford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilhite et al v. Little Rock, City of et al
as 4:2015cv00174
Plaintiff:
William Heath Wilhite and Amy Wilhite
Defendant:
Little Rock, City of and Rusty Rothwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
