Cases 1 - 10 of 45
BALL v. MILLER et al
as 5:2023cv00234
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS LEROY BALL
Defendant:
JUDGE B JR MILLER, SHERIFF DAN KILGORE, LT HEATH EPPINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HEATH v. DOE et al
as 3:2021cv00119
Plaintiff:
TINA HEATH
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, J.S. HELWIG & SON, LLC, HELWIG TRUCKING, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HEATH v. HARPER'S TREE AND STUMP REMOVAL INC et al
as 1:2020cv00211
Defendant:
HARPER'S TREE AND STUMP REMOVAL INC and DONALD RANDOLPH HARPER
Plaintiff:
DONTAVIOUS HEATH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
HEATH et al v. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS INC
as 1:2020cv00125
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Henderson, Walona Heath and Ursula Mays
Defendant:
Resource Management Systems, Inc. and RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PARTLOW v. WHITE et al
as 5:2020cv00265
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD and WARDEN JERMAINE WHITE
Plaintiff:
HEATH DOUGLAS PARTLOW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GUADALUPE, JR v. SEMINOLE COUNTY GEORGIA, et al
as 1:2020cv00032
Defendant:
Randall Craig Carr, Justin Henry, Seminole County, Georgia and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Guadalupe Pequeno, Jr. and GUADALUPE PEQUENO, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FEDD v. YOUNG
as 5:2019cv00327
Defendant:
YOUNG, JANE DOE, BRIDY and others
Plaintiff:
LEVI ARTHUR FEDD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEATH v. PERRY et al
as 5:2019cv00188
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN TIMOTHY SALES and WARDEN CLINTON PERRY
Plaintiff:
KENDRICK D HEATH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2019cv00132
Defendant:
JOAN HEATH, FRYE and GREGORY C DOZIER
Plaintiff:
JAMON DEMETRIUS JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEATH v. MCLAUGHLIN et al
as 5:2018cv00168
Plaintiff:
DAVID A HEATH
Defendant:
GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, MOSLEY, JEFFERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
