Cases 1 - 10 of 251
Lester v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00470
Petitioner:
Timmy Heath Lester
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carlson et al v. Hutchison, Incorporated et al
as 4:2024cv01198
Plaintiff:
Jeff Carlson and Daniel Calderon
Defendant:
Hutchison, Incorporated, Farm & Ranch Holdings, LLC, Farm & Ranch Casualty Corp. and others
Cross Defendant:
George "Buck" Hutchison, Heath C. Hutchison, Shover Blake Hutchison and others
Cross Plaintiff:
Logan Valley Sales Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Heath v. Parte et al
as 2:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Kay Parte, DeAnn Parte, Stacy Davenport and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Heath v. Carillio
as 2:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Keyon Carillio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hancock Whitney Bank v. Storm-Tek Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00799
Plaintiff:
Hancock Whitney Bank
Defendant:
Storm-Tek Inc., Rogelio Topete and Heathe Storm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Heath v. Rowe
as 2:2024cv00089
Petitioner:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Larry Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Heath v. E-Comms et al
as 2:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
E-Comms and Candice Teer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Heath v. Webster et al
as 2:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Quinton Webster, Titus Webster and Rodney Hayden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Heath v. Horton et al
as 2:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Billy . Horton, Kaleh Adams and Kentrell Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
