Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Pacheco v. Duncan et al
as 5:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Respondent:
Michael D. Duncan, Heather S. Warren, Graylan Groce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lilly v. Wellpath, LLC et al
as 5:2023ct03273
Plaintiff:
Stephen Christopher Lilly
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, Katherine Jackson, Suzan Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pacheco v. Warren
as 5:2023cv00153
Petitioner:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Respondent:
Heather Warren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Peoples v. Charlotte-Meck Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
William Henry Peoples, lll
Defendant:
Charlotte-Meck Police Department, Public Defenders Office, State of North Carolina Judges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beltran v. Trant et al
as 5:2022ct03251
Plaintiff:
Ray Beltran
Defendant:
Heather Trant and Scott S. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARRINGTON v. ROSS et al
as 1:2021cv00350
Defendant:
BUTNER FCI FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and DR. HEATHER ROSS
Plaintiff:
THEODORE MACON CARRINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carlyle v. Ingram et al
as 5:2020ct03046
Defendant:
Major Sanders, Nurse Cindy, Nurse Fran and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Len Carlyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HICKS v. SADIE et al
as 1:2019cv00115
Defendant:
SGT. MICHEAL JOHNSTON, JERRY INGRAM, JR., HEATHER SULLIVAN and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. HICKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Landreth v. Henderson County et al
as 1:2018cv00177
Plaintiff:
Lewis Charles Landreth
Defendant:
Henderson County, Heather Payne Brittain, Mark E. Powell and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Blackwell v. Kinlow et al
as 5:2017ct03269
Plaintiff:
Christopher Antwan Blackwell
Defendant:
Chris Kinlow, Ruston Thompson, Heather Rahnisen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
