Cases 31 - 40 of 184
Orwiler v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv02090
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Heather M Orwiler and Heather M. Orwiler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Pittman v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2020cv01978
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security and Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Heather E Pittman and Heather E. Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g
Rodriguez v. Amsberry et al
as 2:2020cv01914
Defendant:
Brady, D. Pedro, Heather Nevil and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Jason Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Misuraca v. Cooper-Krossman
as 3:2020cv01830
Defendant:
Heather Cooper-Krossman
Plaintiff:
Airian Jovan Misuraca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Department of Human Services et al
as 3:2020cv01819
Defendant:
Natalie Taylor, Multnomah County, State of Oregon Department of Human Services and others
Plaintiff:
Melvia Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Petty v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2020cv01780
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Heather K. Petty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01764
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv01504
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Thomas v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2020cv00966
Plaintiff:
Heather Marie Thomas
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g
Abel et al v. PORCH.COM INC. et al
as 3:2020cv00694
Defendant:
Matthew Erlichman, GOSMITH INC., Darwin Widjaja and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Barker, Mark Anderson, Cyril Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
