Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Hill v. Government for the State of West Virginia et al
as 5:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Eric Rodney Hill
Defendant:
Government for the State of West Virginia, F.C.I. Hazelton and Warden Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blackwell v. Ray
as 5:2024cv00003
Petitioner:
Norman Blackwell
Respondent:
Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BARRY v. INCH et al
as 1:2023cv03614
Plaintiff:
BRANDIE LEE BARRY and RANDY CLAYTON BARRY
Consolidated Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RILEY, SANDRA BLEVINS, JAMIE A. MADDOX and others
Defendant:
MARK S INCH, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Ray (Warden)
as 5:2023cv00348
Petitioner:
Maurice Moore
Respondent:
Heather Ray (Warden)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Abraham v. Ray
as 5:2023cv00347
Petitioner:
Daniel Abraham
Respondent:
Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Vaughn v. Ray
as 5:2023cv00324
Petitioner:
Teddy Vaughn
Respondent:
Ms. Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Vaughn v. Ray
as 5:2023cv00296
Petitioner:
Teddy Vaughn
Respondent:
Ms. Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Peachy v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2023cv01506
Petitioner:
Nathan Joel Peachy
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons and Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Milliron v. Ray
as 3:2023cv00204
Petitioner:
William B. Milliron
Respondent:
Miss Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ray v. Alvey
as 4:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Heather Ray
Defendant:
Benjamin Alvey and Amazon Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 mv
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
