Cases 1 - 8 of 8
COHEN et al v. KOCH et al
as 2:2021cv11872
Plaintiff:
PROTEONOMIX, INC., MICHAEL M COHEN and ROGER FIDLER
Defendant:
VICTOR SUTHAMMANONT, TIMOTHY HALLORAN, UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
COUNTRY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. SALIM
as 5:2020cv06409
Defendant:
HEIDI SALIM
Plaintiff:
COUNTRY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Colonial County Mutual Insurance Company v. United States of America et al
as 3:2020cv03273
Plaintiff:
Colonial County Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Heidi L Bearden and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Stoll et al v. Musculoskeletal Institute, Chartered
as 8:2020cv01798
Defendant:
Musculoskeletal Institute, Chartered and Musculoskeletal Institute, Chartered doing business as Florida Orthopaedic Institute
Plaintiff:
Heidi Imhof and Ray Stoll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anderson-Butler et al v. Charming Charlie, Inc. et al
as 2:2014at01019
Plaintiff:
Heidi Anderson-Butler and Paula Haug
Defendant:
Charming Charlie, Inc. and Charming Charlie, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson-Butler, et al. v. Charming Charlie, Inc., et al.
as 2:2014cv01921
Plaintiff:
Heidi Anderson-Butler and Paula Haug
Defendant:
Charming Charlie, Inc. and Charming Charlie, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Farner et al v. Schwartz et al
as 1:2013cv00196
Defendant:
Michael N. Schwartz , Multinational Strategies LLC , Coastal Trading, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Matt Farner , Mary Beth Farner Giacomo , GRM Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Gentlewolf v. Peterson et al
as 1:2007cv00123
Plaintiff:
Jesse-Lynn V. Gentlewolf
Defendant:
Lars Peterson, Heidi Peterson, Thomas Drilling and Blasting Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
