Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Carlton v. Weber et al
as 1:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
David L. Carlton
Defendant:
Shane Weber, Bradley Butler, Corizon Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Brightwell v. Kasahun et al
as 1:2023cv03189
Plaintiff:
David Brightwell
Defendant:
Temesgen MD Kasahun, JCI Hospital Administrator, Agonafir MD Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Doe v. US Fertility, LLC et al
as 8:2022cv01802
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and Jane Doe II
Defendant:
US Fertility, Fertility Centers of Illinois, S.C. and US Fertility LLC
Intervenor:
BRITT DECKER, Patrisia Vela, Karen Logan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Lee, FKA Stone v. Stone
as 8:2021cv03209
Plaintiff:
Heidi Lee, FKA Stone
Defendant:
Elmer William Stone
Interested Party:
Office of Personnel Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Cassel et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2021cv03039
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Cassel, Jr. and Heidi K Cassel
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Andrews v. Andrews
as 1:2021cv01095
Defendant:
Heidi L. Andrews
Plaintiff:
David C. Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Millett v. Saul
as 1:2020cv03724
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Plaintiff:
Heidi Millett
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bready v. Wexford Health Sources et al
as 8:2020cv01021
Defendant:
Cherie L. Henry, Dr. Contah Nimely, Dr. Druckman and others
Plaintiff:
David A. Bready
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01026
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
