Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Bolton et al v. Greenberg
as 1:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
William Walter Bolton and Danielle Heil Bolton
Defendant:
John Greenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Capitol Indemnity Corporation v. BES Design/Build, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00537
Defendant:
BES Construction, LLC, B&B Group, LLC, William W. Bolton and others
Plaintiff:
Capitol Indemnity Corporation
Undetermined:
THOMAS HEIL and THE WILLIAM WALTER BOLTON & FAMILY TRUST DATED MARCH 26, 2018
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Heil Co, The v. McNeilus Companies Inc et al
as 4:2017cv00450
Plaintiff:
Heil Co, The
Defendant:
McNeilus Companies Inc and McNeilus Truckand Manufacturing Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Banks v. Heil et al
as 2:2015cv02245
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Banks
Defendant:
Heil, Voyle and Mental Health Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jernigan v. The City of Eufaula, Alabama et al
as 2:2015cv00363
Plaintiff:
Shirley Jernigan
Defendant:
The City of Eufaula, Alabama and The Heil Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Centimark Corporation v. P & C Construction Inc et al
as 4:2013cv02099
Plaintiff:
Centimark Corporation
Defendant:
P & C Construction Inc and Heil Company Inc, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Liles v. The Heil Co., Inc. et al
as 5:2013cv01409
Plaintiff:
Jason Liles
Defendant:
The Heil Co., Inc. and FMLA Source, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
Rankin et al v. Muscletech Research and Development Inc et al
as 2:2010cv02361
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Rankin , Erwin Santos and Andrew Heil
Defendant:
Muscletech Research and Development Inc, Iovate Health Sciences USA Inc, Iovate Health Sciences Research Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
