Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Akers v. Flannigan, et al
as 21-3166
Plaintiff / Appellant: MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant / Appellee: KIM I. FLANNIGAN, AKA Kim M. Berger, AKA Kim M. Fowler, AKA Kim I. Martin, AKA Kim Martinez-Butts, KATHRYN H. VRATIL, in their nongovernmental capacities, ERIC MELGREN, in their non-governmental capacities and others
Akers v. Flannigan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv02042
Defendant: Kim I. Flannigan, Kathy S. Hill, J. Conover and others
Plaintiff: Montgomery Carl Akers
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal
Jacqueline Arndt, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 20-3627
Plaintiff / Appellee: Waren Kilburn, Dwayne Carr, Jose Rocha and others
Defendant / Appellant: 3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
In Re: Da Graca, et al
as 20-2117
Interested Party: OSVALDO MOTA, ANDREA JOY JAMES, LUCAS VALENTIM and others
Petitioner: JOAO AMADO, FRED KAYITARE, CONROY LEWIS and others
Respondent: THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff, STEVEN J. SOUZA, Superintendent Bristol County House of Corrections in his Official Capacity, CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Meadows on Memorial Owners v. US
as 21-1214
Plaintiff / Appellant: KAWAL KAREAH, XINDI BENAVENTE, KIMBERLY BOOTH and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Arndt et al v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2020cv02089
Plaintiff: Timothy Ferguson, Ahrens Dederscheck, Ernest Cano and others
Defendant: 3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1768
Interested Party: JHONY BONILLA OCHOA, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS, CARLOS CARANGUI and others
Petitioner: MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated and JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated
Respondent: TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1626
Respondent: IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Deputy DIrector and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the DIrector for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Respondent / Appellee: STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement and CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Department of Homeland Security
Petitioner / Appellant: JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated and MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated
Interested Party: RICK RAEMISCH, JULIO MEDEIROS NEVES JUNIO, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS and others
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza, et al
as 20-1564
Petitioner: JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated and MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated
Respondent: IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Deputy DIrector and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the DIrector for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections and others
Interested Party: RICK RAEMISCH, JULIO MEDEIROS NEVES JUNIO, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS and others
Akers v. Conover et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00581
Defendant: Katherine Siereveld, FNU Kelly, J Conover and others
Plaintiff: Montgomery Carl Akers
Cause Of Action: Tort Claim

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?