Cases 41 - 50 of 5,323
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Hernandez v. Gutierrez et al
as 5:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Jose Flores Hernandez
Defendant:
David G. Gutierrez, Eric J.R. Nichols, Governor Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
gomez et al v. Sekhon Carrier Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
ashley gomez, Hunter Chargois, Ruben Hernandez, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Sekhon Carrier Inc., United Specialty Insurance Company and Arshpreet Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Gomez et al v. United Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 3:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Ashley Gomez, Hunter Chargois, Ruben Hernandez and others
Defendant:
United Specialty Insurance Company, Sekhon Carrier, Inc. and Arshpreet Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Hernandez v. Sam's Club
as 4:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Norma Hernandez
Defendant:
Sam's East Inc, Sam's Club and Wal-Mart Stores Inc
Other:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Duarte v. Hernandez et al
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Valerie L. Duarte
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. Postal Service and Kendrick Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gonzalez-Hernandez v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 7:2024cv00086
Petitioner:
Julio Cesar Gonzalez-Hernandez
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
USA v. Lopez-Hernandez
as 24-40150
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jose Luis Lopez-Hernandez
Galvan v. EFT Express SA de CV et al
as 5:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Juvenal Calvillo Galvan
Defendant:
EFT Express SA de CV and Hipolito Hernandez Ponce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
