Cases 11 - 20 of 790
Asisclo Cano-Hernandez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3064
Petitioner:
ASISCLO CANO-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Lentz v. MDOC et al
as 2:2024cv10198
Plaintiff:
Gary Lentz
Defendant:
MDOC, Heidi Washington, Aleksandra Wilanowski and others
Hernandez-Guerrero v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Angelica Hernandez-Guerrero
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hernandez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04129
Plaintiff:
MARIA DEL CARMEN HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jackson v. Cuyahoga Court of Common Pleas et al.
as 1:2023cv02388
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jackson
Defendant:
Cuyahoga Court of Common Pleas, Judge Daniel Gaul, Judge Joan Synenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
American Rent-A-Car v. Hernandez
as 4:2023cv13180
Plaintiff:
American Rent-A-Car
Defendant:
Israel Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
American Rent-A-Car v. Hernandez
as 2:2023cv13178
Plaintiff:
American Rent-A-Car
Defendant:
Israel Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Dilma Hernandez-Carrillo, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3993
Petitioner:
DILMA HERNANDEZ-CARRILLO, SULAIMA SUCELI LOPEZ-HERNANDEZ and MARLON GUDIEL LOPEZ-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Chattanoogie, LLC v. Hernandez Roofing & Construction of Dalton, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00288
Plaintiff:
Chattanoogie, LLC
Defendant:
Hernandez Roofing & Construction of Dalton, LLC, Victor Hernandez, Dalton Total Property Care, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
