Cases 31 - 40 of 9,588
Zaslavsky v. Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-2367
Plaintiff:
NEAL S. ZASLAVSKY, ATTORNEY, an individual
Defendant:
CONSUMER ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES, a California non-profit corporation, MINH TRI NGUYEN, an individual, IBIERE SECK, an individual and others
United States of America v. Morales-Hernandez
as 24-2387
Defendant:
LUIS ANTONIO MORALES-HERNANDEZ, Luis Morales and Luis Morales-Hernandez
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ada W. Hoo v. Luis E. Salgado et al
as 8:2024cv00843
Plaintiff:
Ada W. Hoo
Defendant:
Luis E. Salgado, Maria L. Gomez and Thomas Hernandez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hernandez v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00841
Plaintiff:
Danielle Hernandez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Hernandez Morales v. Garland
as 24-2324
Petitioner:
ULISES HERNANDEZ MORALES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02947
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
(PC) Doss v. Mule Creek State Prison et al
as 2:2024cv01077
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Doss
Defendant:
Mule Creek State Prison, San Joaquin General Hospital, Hia Nyo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2213
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
