Cases 61 - 70 of 175
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv01504
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706
Hernandez v. USA - 2255
as 8:2020cv01427
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Petitioner:
Jose Yobanys Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Euraque-Hernandez v. Warden
as 8:2020cv01129
Plaintiff:
Miguel Euraque-Hernandez
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Amador et al v. Mnuchin et al
as 1:2020cv01102
Defendant:
Charles P. Rettig, U.S. Internal Revenue Service, U.S. Department of the Treasury and others
Plaintiff:
Ivania Amador, Angel Burgos Jimenez, Bradley Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Amador et al v. Mnuchin et al
as 8:2020cv01102
Defendant:
Charles P. Rettig and Steven Mnuchin
Plaintiff:
Ivania Amador, Angel Burgos Jimenez, Bradley Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hernandez et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00612
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carlos Hernandez and Martha Cerquera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hernandez v. Sushi Train, LLC et al
as 8:2020cv00587
Defendant:
Xiaoli Chai, Jian S. Hu, Jianshe Chai and others
Plaintiff:
David Jovel Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00567
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gomez Hernandez et al v. Phoenix Staffing Services, LLC et al
as 8:2019cv03361
Defendant:
Phoenix Staffing Services, LLC and Richard Ernest Phillips
Plaintiff:
Gervin Gomez Hernandez and Ledis Cruz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Guzman et al v. Professional Maintenance Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03063
Plaintiff:
Andres Mercado, Walter Najera, Erick Pena and others
Defendant:
Arien Moore, Anthony Taylor, Professional Maintenance Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
