Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Heslop v. NYC Pumps PMF LLC et al
as 1:2019cv06540
Defendant:
NYC Pumps PMF LLC, NYC Pumps Repair PM LLC, Nicholas Arroyo and others
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Heslop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
James v. Heslop
as 1:2019cv00636
Plaintiff:
Sandra James
Defendant:
Pepeta Heslop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Bradshaw v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv05481
Plaintiff:
Jay Bradshaw
Defendant:
The City of New York and Heslop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00415
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Heslop v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv04707
Plaintiff:
Alafia Heslop
Defendant:
City of New York , New York City Police Department, Joseph Competello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abramowitz et al v. City of White Plains et al
as 7:2010cv08603
Plaintiff:
Arne Abramowitz , Sam Bartholomew , Charles Bradley and others
Defendant:
City of White Plains, Adam T. Bradley, John Callahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. GlaxoSmithKline PLC et al
as 1:2010cv07275
Plaintiff:
Marilyn S. Hayes
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline PLC, Glaxosmithkline Retirement Savings Plan Committee, Andrew Witty and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Gum v. GlaxoSmithKline PLC et al
as 1:2010cv06419
Plaintiff:
Charles J. Gum
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline PLC, Glaxosmithkline Retirement Savings Plan Committee, Andrew Witty and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Heslop v. Artus
as 9:2008cv01105
Petitioner:
Boyd Heslop
Respondent:
Dale Artus
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sayegh et al v. Ram et al
as 7:2007cv08048
Plaintiff:
Diana R. Sayegh, Anthony Matias, Marlene Heslop and others
Defendant:
Wendy Ram, Philip Amicone, Edmund Hartnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
