Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Rhodes v. Smith et al
as 3:2020cv00836
Defendant:
City of Louisville, Dr. A. Smith, Dwayne Clarke and others
Plaintiff:
Brice Jamar Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Hess v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 5:2019cv00110
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Plaintiff:
James Hess
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Watkins v. Hess
as 3:2017cv00650
Plaintiff:
Gene DeShawn M. Watkins
Defendant:
Amy Hess
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coram et al v. Shepherd Communications, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00298
Plaintiff:
Ian Coram , George Bright , Philip Hess and others
Defendant:
Shepherd Communications, Inc. , Time Warner Cable, Inc. and Insight Communications Company, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hess v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00725
Plaintiff:
Jessica Hess
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc., Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hess v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00439
Plaintiff:
Linda Hess
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc., Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Skechers Toning Shoe Products Liability Litigation
as 3:2011md02308
Plaintiff:
In Re: Skechers Toning Shoe Products Liability Litigation, Melissa Kearnely, Richard Kearnely and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Flynn et al v. Shotcrete Services, Inc.
as 4:2010mc00002
Plaintiff:
John Flynn , James Boland , Gerald O'Malley and others
Defendant:
Shotcrete Services, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
