Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-30215
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01604
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
AMITA HEALTH MERCY MEDICAL CENTER AURORA et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2021cv01400
Plaintiff:
D.W. MCMILLAN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH BALL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, BRYAN MEDICAL CENTER - EAST CAMPUS and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
BOURBON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL et al v. COCHRAN et al
as 1:2021cv00513
Plaintiff:
THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER, ST. ALEXIUS MEDICAL CENTER doing business as AMITA HEALTH ST. ALEXIUS MEDICAL CENTER HOFFMAN ESTATES, ST. JOSEPHS HOSPITAL HEALTH CENTER and others
Defendant:
NORRIS COCHRAN and ELIZABETH RICHTER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
ADVOCATE CHRIST HOSPITAL et al v. HARGAN
as 1:2017cv02321
Plaintiff:
ADVOCATE CHRIST HOSPITAL , ADVOCATE CONDELL MEDICAL CENTER , ADVOCATE NORTHSIDE HEALTH SYSTEM and others
Defendant:
ERIC D. HARGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
CAROLINAS HOSPITAL SYSTEM et al v. BURWELL
as 1:2016cv00310
Plaintiff:
CAROLINAS HOSPITAL SYSTEM , NORTH OKALOOSA MEDICAL CENTER , NORTHWEST MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
SYLVIA M. BURWELL
Pecial_master:
JOHN M. FACCIOLA and G. MICHAEL HARVEY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
BERWICK HOSPITAL CENTER et al v. BURWELL
as 1:2016cv00323
Plaintiff:
BERWICK HOSPITAL CENTER , CAROLINAS HOSPITAL SYSTEM, CHESTNUT HILL HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
SYLVIA M. BURWELL
Pecial_master:
JOHN M. FACCIOLA and G. MICHAEL HARVEY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
