Cases 1 - 10 of 193
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hines v. Jones et al
as 3:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
James Hines
Defendant:
Michael Jones and John and Jane Doe(s) I-X
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
HINES v. CITADEL BANK
as 2:2023cv01737
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEROY HINES
Defendant:
CITADEL BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
HINES v. FERGUSON
as 2:2023cv01375
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEROY HINES
Defendant:
TAMMY FERGUSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hines v. Lord et al
as 3:2023cv00399
Plaintiff:
Ja'Barre Hines
Defendant:
Jessica Lord, James K. Stanat, Prime Care Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HINES v. THE LAW FIRM OF LAWYERS MEMTHOMEONOSIS ESQUIRE et al
as 2:2022cv02698
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEROY HINES
Defendant:
THE LAW FIRM OF LAWYERS MEMTHOMEONOSIS ESQUIRE, 20 STEEL MILL WORKERS QUESTIONS and MRS. LERKINS STEEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
