Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Hitchcock v. Jones
as 4:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
Aaron Hitchcock
Defendant:
Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
The Travelers Indemnity Company v. Nova Casualty Company et al
as 1:2021cv05123
Counter Defendant:
The Travelers Indemnity Company
Cross Claimant:
Nova Casualty Company
Cross Defendant:
Willie Person and Jacob Hitchcock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
HITCHCOCK v. USA
as 5:2022cv00020
Petitioner:
ANTHONY HITCHCOCK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Brown v. Doe et al
as 1:2020cv01751
Defendant:
Nurse Fearoun, Dr. Jingle, Nurse John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jodie Lee Brown, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLYDE ARMORY INC, et al v. UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 3:2020cv00042
Defendant:
Blaine Williams, Judd Drake, Unified Government of Athens-Clarke County, Georgia and others
Plaintiff:
Clyde Armory, Inc., FAMILY CHIROPRACTIC OF ATHENS INC, CLYDE ARMORY INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Twillie v. Bobbitt et al
as 6:2018cv00091
Defendant:
Davis, Waynick, Herd and others
Plaintiff:
Jvasezo Ezzay Twillie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plante v. Stewart et al
as 6:2016cv00173
Plaintiff:
Emily Hitchcock Plante and Dustin Plante
Defendant:
Ricky Lee Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
MCQUEEN et al v. SMITH et al
as 3:2015cv00105
Plaintiff:
JAMES MCQUEEN, ORLANDIS M BAUGH, LARRY HITCHCOCK and others
Defendant:
MIKE SMITH, HAILOR, HUFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyons v. Ledbetter et al
as 1:2014cv03467
Plaintiff:
Jonathan A. Lyons
Defendant:
Bobby D. Ledbetter , Brandon Hitchcock , City of Loganville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
