Cases 1 - 10 of 19
LITTLE v. HODAK et al
as 2:2017cv01277
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN B. LITTLE
Defendant:
HODAK, SUSAN BERGEY, KOSTRYK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph McDaniels v. United States of America et al
as 5:2014cv02594
Defendant:
Agular, Agular, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph McDaniels
Brodrick T Collins v. Ross Quinn et al
as 5:2013cv00308
Defendant:
Kenyatta, M Martinez, Angel Ortiz and others
Plaintiff:
Brodrick T Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott Njos v. Norwood, et al
as 12-57273
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT NJOS
Defendant:
NORWOOD, CEO, Victorville Complex Warden, HODAK, Captain, Victorville Complex, ENZELLE, USP Victorville, Lieutenant and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BOURN, USP Victorville, Captain, HURTE, USP Victorville, Lieutenant, MOYER, Officer and others
Timothy Holz v. Robert McFadden, et al
as 11-56418
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY EDWARD HOLZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT E. MCFADDEN, Regional Director, J. L. NORWOOD, FCC Warden, HODAK, Captain, SIA and others
Timothy Holz v. Robert McFadden, et al
as 11-56193
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY EDWARD HOLZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT MCFADDEN, Regional Director, J. L. NORWOOD, FCC Warden, HODAK, Captain, SIA and others
Scott Njos v. Norwood et al
as 5:2010cv01265
Defendant:
#552646-A1, #552646-RI, Adams, -- and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Njos
Timothy Holz v. Robert McFadden, et al
as 10-56300
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY EDWARD HOLZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT E MCFADDEN, Regional Director, J. L. NORWOOD, FCC Warden, HODAK, Captain, SLA and others
Njos v. Norwood et al
as 3:2010cv01736
Plaintiff:
Scott Njos
Defendant:
Norwood, Assistant Warden Over Medical, Hodak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Denny v. Davis et al
as 1:2010cv01659
Plaintiff:
Mark J. Denny
Defendant:
B. (I) Davis, B. Davis, A. (I) W. Sigler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
