Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Dugas v. USA
as 26-40083
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Jarrell Dugas
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Texas, UTMB, University of Texas Medical Branch, Mental Health and others
Mallard v. Hodge Unit - Husk
as 6:2024cv00377
Defendant:
Hodge Unit - Husk
Plaintiff:
Chansler Depaul Mallard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mallard v. Hodge Unit - Husk
as 0:2024cv61867
Defendant:
Hodge Unit - Husk
Plaintiff:
Chansler Depaul Mallard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hodge Unit Staff and Admin. et al
as 6:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
Jacob Charles Smith
Defendant:
Hodge Unit Staff and Admin., Hodge Unit Warden, Hodge Unit Laundry Boss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Polk v. McDanial
as 22-40639
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rossie C. Polk
Defendant / Appellee:
Warden John McDanial, Hodge Unit, Rusk TX, Security Guard Husbrand, Hodge Unit Prison Administration and others
Polk v. McDanial
as 22-40254
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rossie C. Polk
Defendant / Appellee:
Warden John McDanial, Hodge Unit, Rusk TX, Security Guard Husbrand, Hodge Unit Prison Administration and others
Jones v. Hodge Unit Staff Officers et al
as 6:2021cv00318
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Hodge Unit Staff Officers, Unknown Martinez and Unknown Womack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Hodge Unit Officers et al
as 6:2021cv00319
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Garcia
Defendant:
Hodge Unit Officers, Unknown Decker, Unknown Ozuna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. McDanial et al
as 9:2021cv00130
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Dixon
Defendant:
Warden John McDanial, Security Guard Husbrand, Hodge Unit Prison Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Polk et al v. McDanial et al
as 1:2021cv01286
Plaintiff:
Rossie C. Polk and Lawrence Dixon
Defendant:
Warden John McDanial, Security Guard Husbrand, Hodge Unit Prison Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
