Cases 1 - 10 of 425
Belin v. HSNI, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv01999
Plaintiff:
Kyle Belin
Defendant:
Daniel Hodge and HSNI, LLC doing business as Home Shopping Network
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01970
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01877
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07447
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Hodge v. Travel + Leisure Co.
as 5:2024cv06116
Defendant:
Travel + Leisure Co.
Plaintiff:
Vernicky V. Hodge
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Dino DiBlasio v. Steven W. Streit et al
as 2:2024cv05924
Defendant:
Dan R. Henry, George W. Gresham, Glinda Bridgforth Hodges and others
Plaintiff:
Dino DiBlasio
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Kimner v. Currie et al
as 5:2024cv04480
Defendant:
Judge Shiva V. Hodges and Judge Cameron McGowan Currie
Plaintiff:
Audrey L. Kimner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Aaron Jimenez et al v. HiSmile, Inc.
as 2:2024cv04770
Plaintiff:
Robert Parham, Aaron Jimenez, Brittany Hodges and others
Defendant:
HiSmile, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Thompson v. RJD CF Warden et al
as 3:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
David A. Thompson
Defendant:
RJD CF Warden, James S. Hill, L. Schobelock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
