Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Epenesa v. Hoegh Autoliners Holdings AS et al
as 3:2016cv03003
Plaintiff:
Thomas Epenesa
Defendant:
Hoegh Autoliners Holdings AS and Hoegh Autoliners, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Vehicle Carrier Service
as 15-3353
Defendant / Appellee:
WALLENIUS WILHELMSEN LOGISTICS AS, WORLD LOGISTIC SERVICE USA INC, EUKOR CAR CARRIERS INC and others
Amicus Curiae:
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARGO AGENTS INC, INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT CORP and MANACO INTERNATIONAL FORWARDERS INC
Defendant:
HOEGH AUTOLINERS HOLDINGS AS, AUTOTRANS AS and ALLIANCE NAVIGATION LLC
In re: Vehicle Carrier Service
as 15-3353
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARGO AGENTS INC, INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT CORP and MANACO INTERNATIONAL FORWARDERS INC
Defendant - Appellee:
NIPPON YUSEN KABUSHIKI KAISHA, NYK LINE NORTH AMERICA INC, MITSUI OSK LINES and others
Defendant:
HOEGH AUTOLINERS HOLDINGS AS, AUTOTRANS AS and ALLIANCE NAVIGATION LLC
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. v. Hoegh Autoliners Holdings AS
as 3:2014cv00745
Plaintiff:
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
Defendant:
Hoegh Autoliners Holdings AS
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 741
F. RUGGIERO & SONS, INC. et al v. NYK LINE (NORTH AMERICA) INC. et al
as 2:2013cv03306
Plaintiff:
RUSH TRUCK CENTERS OF OHIO, INC., Hudson Gastonia Acquisition, LLC, Martens Cars of Washington, Inc. and others
Defendant:
TOYOFUJI SHIPPING CO. LTD., COMPANIA SUD AMERICANA DE VAPORES S.A., NYK LINE (NORTH AMERICA) INC. and others
In Re:
VEHICLE CARRIER SERVICES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Singh v. A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S et al
as 1:2011cv00934
Plaintiff:
Arun Pratap Singh
Defendant:
A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S , A.P. Moller Singaporte Pte Ltd., Hoegh Autoliners Holdings, AS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
