Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Lundahl v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv02281
Petitioner:
Holli Telford Lundahl
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, Collette Peters, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lundahl v. Garland
as 3:2023cv02040
Plaintiff:
Holli Telford Lundahl
Defendant:
Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poff v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv00621
Plaintiff:
Julia Ann Poff, Holli Telford Lundahl and Cheryl Steward
Defendant:
Warden Michael Smith and Collette Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lundahl v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv00632
Plaintiff:
Holli Telford Lundahl
Defendant:
Warden Michael Smith and Collette Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lundahl v. Smith
as 23-10562
Petitioner / Appellant:
Holli Telford Lundahl
Respondent / Appellee:
M. Smith, Carswell FMC, Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, Collete Peters, Director of the BOP and others
Lundahl v. Smith et al
as 4:2022cv01017
Petitioner:
Holli Telford Lundahl
Respondent:
M. Smith, Merrick Garland, Collete Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Telford v. Zions Bancorporation et al
as 4:2016cv01051
Plaintiff:
Hollie Telford
Defendant:
Zions Bancorporation, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Ann Jessen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Marti Telford, et al v. Eric Lyon, et al
as 10-51123
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTI TELFORD, HOLLI TELFORD and CINDY CHRISTENSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC LYON, KEVIN MCDONOUGH, UTAH DEPARTMENTS OF TRANSPORTATION and others
Holli Lundahl v. USA, et al
as 10-11156
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOLLI TELFORD LUNDAHL, personally and as assignee of M.D. Diet Companies
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, VICKY GREGORY, MARY CORPORON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
