Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Holliman v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv03483
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Felicia V Holliman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rachel Lessem, et al v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 17-80180
Plaintiff - Respondent:
RACHEL LESSEM, an individual, KIM HOLLIMAN, an individual, DEBORA BROICH, as wife and as an individual and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
PFIZER, INC.
Rachel Lessem, et al v. Pfizer, Inc., et al
as 17-56294
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RACHEL LESSEM, an individual, KIM HOLLIMAN, an individual, DEBORA BROICH, as wife and as an individual and others
Defendant - Appellant:
PFIZER, INC.
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and DOES, 1-50
Smith-Root Inc v. Holliman
as 3:2017cv05641
Plaintiff:
Smith-Root Inc
Defendant:
Michael Farland Holliman
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Rachel Lessem et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02841
Plaintiff:
Jane E. Abbey, Hiawatha Barksdale, Margaret Beech and others
Defendant:
DOES, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer, Inc.
Brooks et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03811
Plaintiff:
Shelia Baker, Linda Barnes, Marita Berry and others
Defendant:
Does 1-50, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer Inc.
Holiman v. Williams et al
as 2:2015cv00762
Defendant:
Attorney General State of Nevada
Petitioner:
Reginald L. Holliman
Respondent:
Brian Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Long v. Holliman et al
as 1:2009cv05980
Plaintiff:
Maham Long, Jr.
Defendant:
Brandon Holliman and Michael Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Long v. Holliman et al
as 3:2009cv05980
Plaintiff:
Maham Long, Jr.
Defendant:
Brandon Holliman and Michael Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Long v. Holliman et al
as 3:2009cv05980
Plaintiff:
Maham Long, Jr.
Defendant:
Brandon Holliman and Michael Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
