Cases 1 - 6 of 6
MS State Conference of NAACP, et al v. Haley Barbour
as 13-60039
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MISSISSIPPI STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similaly Situated, ROD WOULLARD, HOLLIS WATKINS and others
Movant - Appellant:
STANDING JOINT LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE ON REAPPORTIONMENT OF THE MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE
Buck et al v. Barbour et al
as 3:2011cv00717
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Buck , Thomas Pucket , Jeanette Self and others
Defendant:
Haley Barbour, Jim Hood , Delbert Hosemann and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Mississippi State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People et al v. Barbour et al THREE JUDGE PANEL: LEE, JOLLY, GUIROLA
as 3:2011cv00159
Plaintiff:
Mississippi State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People , Thomas Plunkett , Rod Woullard and others
Defendant:
Haley Barbour , Jim Hood , Delbert Hosemann and others
Intervenor:
Apportionment and Elections Committee of the Mississippi House of Representatives and Terry C. Burton
Intervenor_plaintiff:
MS Senate Democratic Caucus and Individual MS Democratic Senators
Intervenor_defendant:
Sidney Bondurant , Becky Currie and Mary Ann Stevens
Amicu:
The Mississippi Tea Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gates v. Beltone Hearing Centers of Florida, L.L.C. et al
as 9:2010cv80337
Plaintiff:
Holly Watkins Gates
Defendant:
Don Kutik
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gates v. Beltone Hearing Centers of Florida, L.L.C. et al
as 5:2009cv00528
Plaintiff:
Holly Watkins Gates
Defendant:
Beltone Hearing Centers of Florida, L.L.C. and Don Kutik
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Watkins v. Town of Ruston, et al
as 3:2008cv05439
Plaintiff:
Holly Watkins
Defendant:
Ruston Town of, James Reinhold, Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
