Cases 31 - 40 of 1,497
United States of America v. Holmes
as 23-1040
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES
Silver Fern Chemical Inc v. Lyons et al
as 2:2023cv00775
Plaintiff:
Silver Fern Chemical, Inc.
Defendant:
Scott Lyons, Troy Kinto, King Holmes and others
Holmes v. Social Security Commissioner et al
as 9:2023mc80771
In Re:
In re: Derwin Mandell Holmes
Petitioner:
Tyrone T. Holmes
Respondent:
Social Security Commissioner and Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Holmes v. Experian Information Solutions Inc
as 1:2023cv02973
Plaintiff:
Deiadre Holmes
Defendant:
Experian Information Solutions Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Holmes et al v. Mayoekas et al
as 1:2023cv03847
Plaintiff:
RENEA HOLMES and LEROY THADDEUS TAVARES
Defendant:
Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
In re: Johnny Gregory
as 23-11379
Petitioner:
In re: JOHNNY BRETT GREGORY
Respondent:
ROBERT B. ADAMS, PAT GIDDENE, AMBER WINKLER and others
Tysha Holmes v. United States Department of the Army
as 23-1459
Petitioner:
TYSHA S. HOLMES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY and MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
Stanny Ray Hudgins et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as SC/2:23-CV-01747
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC FIRE & SECURITY AMERICAS CORPORATION, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Stanny Ray Hudgins, Philip Wendell Gould, Frank Joseph Micalizzi and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 23-464
Petitioner:
Towaki Komatsu
Respondent:
City of New York, NYPD Officer Saquoi Harris, Shield #2350, NYPD Officer Steven Perez, Shield 23485 and others
Defendant:
NYPD Officer Rodriguez, NYPD Steve Ortiz, NYPD Jeffrey Peattie and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
