Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Holmes v. Harry et al
as 4:2024cv00655
Petitioner:
James Franklin Holmes
Respondent:
Laurel Harry and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Williamson et al v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2023cv01781
Plaintiff:
Bobby Kenneth Williamson, Antonio Bundy and Nicholas Edwards
Defendant:
John E Wetzel, Tabb Bickell, Erin Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Children's Aid Society Southern PA District Church of the Brethren et al
as 1:2023cv01742
Plaintiff:
Angela Holmes
Defendant:
Children's Aid Society Southern District of PA Church of the Brethren doing business as The Lehman Center, Eric Chase, Gina Nobile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Holmes v. Sage
as 1:2022cv00923
Petitioner:
Antonio Holmes
Respondent:
Warden J. Sage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Endrikat v. Ransom et al
as 1:2021cv01684
Plaintiff:
Robert Endrikat
Defendant:
Ransom, George Miller, J Cirelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. American Home Patient/Lincare
as 4:2021cv01683
Plaintiff:
Patricia Holmes
Defendant:
American Home Patient/Lincare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Holmes v. Cassiliano
as 3:2021cv00534
Defendant:
Rebecca Cassiliano
Plaintiff:
Michele Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Holmes v. Sutherland Global Logistics, LLC.
as 4:2020cv01979
Defendant:
Sutherland Global Logistics, LLC. d/b/a Seko Logistics - Med Tec
Plaintiff:
Patricia Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01914
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
