Cases 1 - 10 of 15
CP Investment Group, LLC et al v. Eastpointe, City of et al
as 2:2022cv12920
Plaintiff:
CP Investment Group, LLC and Haze Cannabis
Defendant:
City of Eastpointe, Kim Homan, Nick Sage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fuller v. Homan Transportation, Inc., et al
as 1:2021cv00630
Plaintiff:
Keith Fuller
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Attorney William C. Failey
Defendant:
Homan Transportation Inc, Daniel Ault and Homan Transportation, Inc.
Petitioner:
Daniel J. Ault
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Wolf et al
as 1:2020cv00286
Respondent:
Matthew Albence, Chad F. Wolf and Thomas Homan
Petitioner:
Frederick Vernon Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rranxburgaj v. Nielsen et al
as 2:2018cv11832
Petitioner:
Ded Rranxburgaj
Defendant:
Kristjen Nielsen, Jefferson Sessions, III, Rebecca Adducci and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv11684
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv11218
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv10935
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 2:2017cv14146
Plaintiff:
Marissa Little, Rob Nestore, Emily Couch and others
Defendant:
General Motors Company, LLC and General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv11910
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicu:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv11222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
