Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Hood v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65055
Plaintiff:
Roy Hood
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hood v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Samuel Hood, Jr.
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wood v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Michael Wood
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Deanna Williamson, Freda Adu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hood v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02198
Plaintiff:
David Hood
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stone v. Mahoning County, et al.
as 4:2023cv01138
Plaintiff:
Mary Stone
Defendant:
Mahoning County, William Cappabianca, Kenneth Kountz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hood v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv01791
Plaintiff:
Cashawn Hood
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Hood v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01123
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hood
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hood v. Jordan Restaurant Group HQ LLC d/b/a Hen Quarter et al
as 2:2022cv00486
Plaintiff:
Zak Hood
Defendant:
Jordan Restaurant Group HQ LLC d/b/a Hen Quarter, Jordan Restaurant Group, LLC, Jordan Hospitality Group, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hood v. C.R. Bard et al
as 2:2021cv04427
Plaintiff:
James A Hood
Defendant:
C.R. Bard and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
