Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Hooper v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01918
Plaintiff:
David Hooper
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jevicks v. Hooper, Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv10610
Plaintiff:
Teresa Jevicks
Defendant:
Charles Hooper, Jr. and Gray Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Hooper v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01687
Plaintiff:
Betty Hooper
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hooper v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00761
Plaintiff:
Leonard Hooper
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hooper v. C.R. Bard et al
as 2:2021cv05468
Plaintiff:
Andrew Hooper
Defendant:
C.R. Bard and Davol Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hooper v. Ethicon, Inc. et al (JRG1)
as 1:2020cv00191
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon LLC
Plaintiff:
Linda F. Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hooper et al v. C.R. Bard Inc. Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv03520
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc. Corporation
Plaintiff:
Charity Hooper and Jackie Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hooper et al v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Inc.
as 1:2018cv00171
Plaintiff:
Shermel J. Hooper and Joe Lawrence Hooper
Defendant:
Grand Trunk Western Railroad Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yancy v. THE MERCHANTS COMPANY et al
as 2:2016cv02336
Plaintiff:
Mark H. Yancy
Defendant:
THE MERCHANTS COMPANY and CHRISTOPHER HOOPER
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2014dp20532
Plaintiff:
Rosalie Hooper Thomas and Stanley R Thomas
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
