Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 217
HOOPER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03041
Plaintiff: JOHN ASHLEY HOOPER
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOOPER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02372
Plaintiff: STEVEN HOOPER
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01474
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
ADAIR v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13608
Plaintiff: BRANDON HOOPER ADAIR
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOOPER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11863
Plaintiff: BILLIE SUZANN LEE HOOPER
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Doherty v. St. Lucie County et al
as 2:2022cv14287
Plaintiff: Keith Robert Doherty
Defendant: St. Lucie County, St. Lucie County Public Defender's Office, Diamond Litty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Hooper v. Jerry Insurance Agency, Inc.
as 6:2022cv00849
Plaintiff: Shannon Hooper
Defendant: Jerry Insurance Agency, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Hooper v. Winston County Sheriff Department
as 6:2022cv00378
Plaintiff: Benjamin Ryan Hooper
Defendant: Winston County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carmichael v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00303
Plaintiff: Roderick Carmichael
Defendant: Wexford Health Sources Inc, Finley and Charles Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hooper v. Newell
as 6:2022cv00259
Plaintiff: Benjamin Ryan Hooper
Defendant: Michael E Newell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?